<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Emergent Intelligence: SocialText and Baynote</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.competingonexecution.com/2010/01/emergent-intelligence-socialtext-and-baynote/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.competingonexecution.com/2010/01/emergent-intelligence-socialtext-and-baynote/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 04:58:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Hunt</title>
		<link>http://www.competingonexecution.com/2010/01/emergent-intelligence-socialtext-and-baynote/comment-page-1/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.competingonexecution.com/?p=214#comment-131</guid>
		<description>Thought-provoking post.  Many companies have a long way to go to engender true internal collaboration/social cultures, where it is part of “business as usual” and contributes to overall group productivity.  Many times upper management wants to control not cultivate. They know how to buy tools, but empowering and respecting the human side of collaboration/social interaction is a completely different challenge.  As you say, it’s not just about automation, but augmentation -- from the “wisdom of the crowd” – with the understanding that each and every time, the crowd is people.  To your statement, “The take-away is that emergent intelligence comes from people and data,”  I would add the  dimension of context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought-provoking post.  Many companies have a long way to go to engender true internal collaboration/social cultures, where it is part of “business as usual” and contributes to overall group productivity.  Many times upper management wants to control not cultivate. They know how to buy tools, but empowering and respecting the human side of collaboration/social interaction is a completely different challenge.  As you say, it’s not just about automation, but augmentation &#8212; from the “wisdom of the crowd” – with the understanding that each and every time, the crowd is people.  To your statement, “The take-away is that emergent intelligence comes from people and data,”  I would add the  dimension of context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SiliconANGLE &#8212; Blog &#8212; What&#8217;s Wrong with Today&#8217;s Enterprise Software? [Emergent Intelligence]</title>
		<link>http://www.competingonexecution.com/2010/01/emergent-intelligence-socialtext-and-baynote/comment-page-1/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>SiliconANGLE &#8212; Blog &#8212; What&#8217;s Wrong with Today&#8217;s Enterprise Software? [Emergent Intelligence]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.competingonexecution.com/?p=214#comment-126</guid>
		<description>[...] Note: Cross-posted from Competing on Execution [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Note: Cross-posted from Competing on Execution [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
